TA Training - STA199

Active Learning + Interacting with Students

Dr. Elijah Meyer
Eli Gnesin

Duke University

2024-01-12

Introductions

Outline

– Teaching

--- Active Learning 
--- Interacting with Students 

– Quarto

--- How we Teach Quarto in 199
--- Common Student Mistakes

During the workshop

This is a space to talk and think critically about teaching

– Breakout rooms

– Group discussions

– Activities

TAs Matter

“Several of the factors that contribute to STEM retention relate to how faculty teach and the messages they send. Notably, more than 90% of students who left STEM majors mentioned concern about the poor quality of teaching in their introductory college courses” (Seymour and Hewitt 1997)

TAs Matter

“Several of the factors that contribute to STEM retention relate to how faculty teach and the messages they send. Notably, more than 90% of students who left STEM majors mentioned concern about the poor quality of teaching in their introductory college courses” (Seymour and Hewitt 1997)

How to send the right message

What message do we want to send?

What are some strategies we can use to send the right message?

  • Message: We care & want them to be successful

  • Be on time (lab + office hours)

  • Communicate with your students

  • Be approachable

Approachability

Breakout Room (~5 minutes)

Recall an instructor who you felt comfortable approaching during lab/office hours and one who you did not. Why were you comfortable approaching the one teacher, but not the other?

Discussion

Approachability (Key Take-Aways)

How and what we communicate verbally and non-verbally matter!

It’s not only what you say, but also how you communicate it

Difficult situations will arise when interacting with students.

– How we respond verbally and non-verbally matters!

– Instructors will handle different situations differently

– Be flexible and adapt to the situation and context you encounter.

Other practical 199 tips

– Support each other & the instructor

– Do not promise points to students

– Follow up with students

TAs Matter

“Several of the factors that contribute to STEM retention relate to how faculty teach and the messages they send. Notably, more than 90% of students who left STEM majors mentioned concern about the poor quality of teaching in their introductory college courses” (Seymour and Hewitt 1997)

TAs are Teachers

You are not just an answer key…

– You teach students during lab

– You teach students during office hours

– … and how you teach matters!

How you teach matters

Students being taught using passive lecture techniques report general dissatisfaction with the overall learning environment, lack of structure, and impersonal nature of their courses (Cooper and Robinson 2000)

Active Learning

“Several national reports have called for universities to move away from lecture and incorporate active learning into undergraduate STEM courses” (Advancement of Science et al. 2011; Olson and Riordan 2012)

What is active learning?

Active Learning

My definition: Discovery based learning where the instructor uses sets of techniques that involve students in the learning process.

Where the learning process is a shared responsibility between the instructor and student.

– Any technique that actively engages students in the material

“Active learning, in contrast, is grounded in constructivist theory, which holds that humans learn by actively using new information and experiences to modify their existing models of how the world works” (Theobald et al. 2020)

National Recommendations

Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education

Use active learning

– Teach statistics as an investigative process of problem-solving and decision making.

– Give students experience with multivariable thinking.

– Focus on conceptual understanding.

(Wood et al. 2018)

More reasons to care

Setting students up for future academic success

– Increased assessment scores; decreased failure rates (Freeman et al. 2014)

– Improved critical thinking skills (Nelson and Crow 2014)

– Problem solving skills (Gleason et al. 2011)

What does this look like?

Prepared by Chris O’Neal and Tershia Pinder-Grover, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan

In Lab & Office Hours

How could active learning be incorporated?

  • Answering questions with questions

  • Allow for mistakes

  • Help students discover material

  • Facilitating group conversation

  • Assigning roles to students in groups

Key Take-Aways

– Active learning looks different in different classrooms and for different instructors … and that’s okay!

– Adapt active learning to fit who you are as an instructor!

Key Take-Aways

Implementation Matters!

– Using a particular strategy does not guarantee students are actively engaged in the material … it’s more about how you use a strategy than what the strategy is itself.

Key Take-Aways

Transparency is key!

– Students are more likely to “buy-in” when they understand why you are using some of the strategies you are

Research Based Recommendations

Make time for teaching

– Habitual reflection and self-evaluation

– Classroom observations

– Formal interactions (discuss teaching in weekly meetings)

– Informal interactions (discuss teaching with each other)

(Justice 2020)

Resources

Active Learning Ideas

GAISE reports

GAISE example

– Your instructor

– Other instructors

Your role in student education is critical

short break

References

Advancement of Science, American Association for the et al. 2011. “Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action.” Washington, DC.
Cooper, James, and Pamela Robinson. 2000. “Getting Started: Informal Small‐group Strategies in Large Classes.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2000 (March): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8102.
Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Gleason, Brenda L., Michael J. Peeters, Beth H. Resman-Targoff, Samantha Karr, Sarah McBane, Kristi Kelley, Tyan Thomas, and Tina H. Denetclaw. 2011. “An Active-Learning Strategies Primer for Achieving Ability-Based Educational Outcomes.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 75 (9): 186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe759186.
Justice, Nicola. 2020. “Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Statistics: A Review of Research and Ten Practical Recommendations.” Journal of Statistics Education 28 (3): 334–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1841590.
Nelson, Larry, and Mary Crow. 2014. “Do Active-Learning Strategies Improve Students’ Critical Thinking?” Higher Education Studies 4 (March). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n2p77.
Olson, Steve, and Donna Gerardi Riordan. 2012. “Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President.” Executive Office of the President.
Seymour, Elaine, and Nancy M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder.
Theobald, Elli J., Mariah J. Hill, Elisa Tran, Sweta Agrawal, E. Nicole Arroyo, Shawn Behling, Nyasha Chambwe, et al. 2020. “Active Learning Narrows Achievement Gaps for Underrepresented Students in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (12): 6476–83. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117.
Wood, Beverly L., Megan Mocko, Michelle Everson, Nicholas J. Horton, and Paul Velleman. 2018. “Updated Guidelines, Updated Curriculum: TheGAISE College Reportand Introductory Statistics for the Modern Student.” CHANCE 31 (2): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2018.1467642.